ABOS — Acumen Pharmaceuticals
Company context · prepared 2026-08-07 · company sweep 2026-08-07 · USD · framework v5.5.0
How to read this. Written for a reader who has not studied pharmacology or finance. General terms are defined once in
framework/04-glossary.md. Tags:[VERIFIED — source]/[UNVERIFIED]/[WEB ESTIMATE — source, date].Program analyses for this company are the sub-folders listed in C.2.
C.0 Company-tier coverage — CLEARED
| Tool | State | Note / verbatim error |
|---|---|---|
BPIQ fetch_company_info | CALLED | One record. Price $2.28, market capitalisation, enterprise value, cash, burn, 52-week range, ownership, short interest. Financial fields still timestamped 2026-03-31 — no balance sheet has been published since; Q2 2026 results are scheduled for 2026-08-12. Short-interest fields timestamped 2026-07-15. |
BPIQ fetch_company_drugs | CALLED | 4 rows, all reproduced in C.2. Identical row set to the 2026-08-04 sweep; the note field on row 14145 now carries six consecutive “Late 2026” reiterations. |
BPIQ fetch_company_historical_catalysts | CALLED | 8 rows, 2024-07-28 to 2026-07-15 — unchanged since 2026-08-04. Two of the eight are the same 2026-07-15 press release filed under two drug names, so there are seven distinct event dates and six carry price data. |
BPIQ fetch_company_options_data | CALLED | 5 expiries: 2026-08-21, 2026-09-18, 2026-10-16, 2026-12-18, 2027-01-15. Three strikes only, at $2.50, $5.00 and $7.50 — still no strike below $2.50 on a $2.28 stock. New since 2026-08-04: modest January 2027 call activity (320 contracts traded on the $5.00 call, open interest 186). |
BPIQ fetch_company_insider_transactions | CALLED | 233 rows, 2021-07-06 to 2026-06-17. Response exceeded the tool output limit and was read from the saved file. No new row since the 2026-08-04 sweep. The full-history behaviour (not limited to four quarters) reproduces. |
BPIQ fetch_company_press_releases | CALLED | 207 items, 2021-07-01 to 2026-08-05. Response exceeded the tool output limit and was read from the saved file. One material new item since 2026-08-04: Q2 2026 results scheduled for 2026-08-12 (announced 2026-08-05). |
BPIQ fetch_company_hedge_fund_holdings (optional) | CALLED | 18 quarters, 2022Q2 to 2026Q2, unchanged since 2026-08-04. The 2023Q4 Boxer Capital value reproduces the documented 1000× bug; see C.8. |
BPIQ fetch_company_earnings_transcript (optional) | CALLED | Still the Q1 2026 call of 2026-05-12 — the Q2 call is 2026-08-12. It remains the source for the Phase 2 dose levels, management’s own definition of a clear win, the IgG2-subclass argument and the pTau217 screening data. |
C.1 What the company is
Acumen Pharmaceuticals is a clinical-stage biotechnology company in Newton, Massachusetts, and it
is a single-asset company in every practical sense [VERIFIED — BPIQ fetch_company_info 2026-08-07]. It has no product revenue of any kind. Every one of its four pipeline programs is in
Alzheimer’s disease, and three of the four are variations on one molecule or one delivery
technology.
The lead asset is sabirnetug, also called ACU193. It is a laboratory-made antibody — a protein
engineered to stick to one specific target in the body — designed to bind soluble clumps of a
protein called amyloid-beta while largely ignoring the hardened deposits of the same protein
[VERIFIED — J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2025, DOI 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100005]. It is in a Phase 2
trial called ALTITUDE-AD whose results are due in Late 2026. That single readout is what the equity
is [VERIFIED — BPIQ fetch_company_drugs 2026-08-07].
Two things about the financial position changed materially in 2026 and both are in C.3. The company
now carries bank debt, and its own accounts state that there is substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern without more money [VERIFIED — Acumen Q1 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-05-12]. It is not funded through to a Phase 3 trial, and on its own guidance it is
funded only into early 2027 — a few months past the readout it is waiting for. The next scheduled
disclosure is the Q2 2026 report on 2026-08-12 [VERIFIED — press feed 2026-08-05].
C.2 Pipeline — every program
All four rows returned by fetch_company_drugs on 2026-08-07. The catalyst column reports
catalyst_date_text exactly as disclosed; the “to a day?” column is yes only where that text names
a day (01-rules.md, rule 23).
| Program (drug — indication) | bpiq_drug_id | Stage & event | Catalyst (as disclosed) | Date to a day? | Analysed? | Materiality to the stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabirnetug (ACU193) — Alzheimer’s disease | 14145 | Phase 2 Data readout (ALTITUDE-AD) | Late 2026 | No — a half-year, not a day. BPIQ stores 2026-12-31 as a placeholder. | Yes → sabirnetug-alzheimers/ | Dominant. The only row with has_catalyst: true, the only row that has ever generated human efficacy data, and the only row that can support a registration filing this decade. Every other row is either the same molecule in a different formulation or a preclinical programme that will not reach a clinic before 2027. On a recomputed enterprise value of roughly $103M (C.4) this readout is close to the whole equity. |
| Sabirnetug (ACU193) w/ ENHANZE® — Alzheimer’s disease | 17765 | Phase 1 Update | Late 2026 | No — a half-year, not a day. BPIQ stores 2026-12-31 as a placeholder. has_catalyst is false. | No | Not assessed — program not analysed. The under-the-skin formulation of the same molecule, using Halozyme’s ENHANZE enzyme technology. Its Phase 1 (NCT06511570, n=28, healthy volunteers) completed in September 2024 and reported topline on 2025-03-19. Four consecutive quarterly releases since have reiterated it as “in development” with no new milestone. It is entirely downstream of 14145: it has no independent value if the molecule fails, and management said on 2026-05-12 that the Phase 2 dose data will decide how it enters a Phase 3 programme. |
| ACU401 (Transferrin Bispecific Antibody) — Alzheimer’s disease | 20579 | IND Submission | Mid-2027 | No — a half-year, not a day. BPIQ stores 2027-08-15 as a placeholder. has_catalyst is false. | No | Not assessed — program not analysed. One of two Enhanced Brain Delivery candidates nominated on 2026-06-16 under the JCR Pharmaceuticals collaboration. Preclinical: monkey data presented at AAIC on 2026-07-15 showed up to 40-fold higher frontal-cortex exposure with no blood-count safety signals. An application to begin human testing is planned for Mid-2027, so the first patient is 2028 at the earliest. It is real optionality and it is why the company raised $35.75M in March 2026, but the market marked the stock down 12.6% on the day that data was presented (C.7). |
| ACU301 (Transferrin Bispecific Antibody) — Alzheimer’s disease | 20578 | IND Submission | Mid-2027 | No — a half-year, not a day. BPIQ stores 2027-08-15 as a placeholder. has_catalyst is false. | No | Not assessed — program not analysed. The second of the two candidates nominated on 2026-06-16, on the same timetable and with the same reasoning as 20579 above. |
No row is marked Failed or Discontinued. That is a finding rather than a comfort: Acumen has
never shut a programme down, so there is no record of how management behaves when something does
not work, and there is also no second molecule that has ever been given to a patient.
All four rows carry the indication text “Alzheimer’s disease”, so the indication does not separate
them. The integer bpiq_drug_id does.
C.3 Financial position
| Item | Value | As of | Tag |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and equivalents | $128.4M, being cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. Up from $116.9M at 2025-12-31 purely because of the March 2026 private placement. This is still the newest published balance sheet; the Q2 figure arrives 2026-08-12. | 2026-03-31 | [VERIFIED — Acumen Q1 2026 results release and Form 10-Q, 2026-05-12; BPIQ fetch_company_info carries the same figure with the same 2026-03-31 stamp] |
| Cash and equivalents, modelled today | ~$91–95M. About 4.2 months of operating burn taken off the 2026-03-31 balance, less roughly $2.3M of term-loan principal since amortisation began on 2026-07-01. | 2026-08-07 | [UNVERIFIED — modelled] |
| Burn (per month) | $8.08M. Recomputed from the balance movement: $116.9M at 2025-12-31, plus $35.75M of gross placement proceeds, less $128.4M at 2026-03-31, is $24.25M consumed in the quarter. BPIQ’s monthly_burn of $8.04M agrees to within half a percent, so it is not rejected here. The Q1 net loss of $20.7M ($6.90M a month) and Q1 operating expense of $21.2M ($7.07M a month) are both lower than the cash figure, because cash burn also carries interest on the term loan and working-capital movements. The cash figure is the one used. | Q1 2026 | [VERIFIED — Q1 2026 release 2026-05-12, cross-checked against BPIQ] |
| Runway as the company states it | ”Into early 2027.” The company states this plainly and pairs it with an explicit going-concern conclusion: substantial doubt exists about its ability to continue as a going concern without additional capital. Watch whether this wording changes on 2026-08-12. | 2026-05-12 | [VERIFIED — Acumen Q1 2026 Form 10-Q and Q1 2026 earnings call] |
| Runway recomputed (cash ÷ burn) | On operating burn alone, $128.4M ÷ $8.08M ≈ 15.9 months from 2026-03-31, which is approximately 2027-07. That is not the right calculation here, because term-loan principal began amortising on 2026-07-01 and adds roughly $1.86M a month ($31.6M spread to the 2027-11-01 maturity). At the combined $9.94M a month the runway is ≈12.9 months from 2026-03-31, which is approximately 2027-04. The company’s “early 2027” is that figure with a prudence buffer, and it reconciles. | 2026-08-07 | [UNVERIFIED — modelled from verified inputs] |
| Debt | $31.6M outstanding including the final payment. A Loan and Security Agreement with K2 HealthVentures LLC dated 2023-11-10 provided a $50.0M facility of which $30.0M was drawn; a $20.0M tranche remains undrawn. Interest is the greater of 9.65% or the prime rate plus 1.15%. Principal and interest repay in equal monthly instalments from 2026-07-01 to a 2027-11-01 maturity, extendable to 2028-11-01 if the company hits certain financing milestones. The lender also holds a warrant over 730,769 shares at $1.95. | 2026-03-31 | [VERIFIED — Acumen Q1 2026 Form 10-Q] |
Dilution history. Every raise in the last 24 months, plus the resale registration.
| Date | Instrument | Gross proceeds | Price | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-16 | Private placement of 10,833,333 shares to RA Capital Management, ADAR1 Capital Management, Sands Capital Alternatives and others, raised specifically to fund the Enhanced Brain Delivery portfolio rather than ALTITUDE-AD. RA Capital took 6,060,606 shares for $20.0M. | $35.75M | $3.30 per share | [VERIFIED — company release 2026-03-16/17; BPIQ fetch_company_insider_transactions records the RA Capital line at $3.30 on 2026-03-16] |
| 2026-04-01 | Registration statement covering 10.83M shares for resale. Capacity to sell, not a raise: these are the March placement shares becoming freely tradeable. It enlarges the float, it does not enlarge the share count. | — | — | [VERIFIED — press feed 2026-03-27, 2026-03-28 and 2026-04-01] |
| 2023-11-10 | K2 HealthVentures term loan, $30.0M drawn of a $50.0M facility. Debt rather than equity, but it is the reason the runway calculation above is not cash ÷ burn. | $30.0M | n/a — warrant over 730,769 shares at $1.95 attached | [VERIFIED — Acumen Q1 2026 Form 10-Q] |
Is a raise likely before the next catalyst? The honest answer is that it is likely either just before or immediately after, and the company would prefer after. It has already declared substantial doubt about going concern, it has an undrawn $20.0M debt tranche it has chosen not to draw, and its own stated runway ends within roughly one quarter of the readout it is waiting for. The March 2026 placement was explicitly earmarked for the preclinical brain-delivery portfolio, which tells you that the Phase 2 trial itself was already paid for and that the balance sheet has no room for anything beyond it. A holder should assume that a positive Late 2026 readout is followed within weeks by an equity raise at whatever the new price is, and that a negative one is followed by a financing done from a position of no strength. The 2026-08-12 Q2 report is the next place a shelf registration or at-the-market facility could surface.
C.4 Valuation frame
| Item | Value | Source / tag |
|---|---|---|
| Share price (spot) | $2.28 | [VERIFIED — BPIQ fetch_company_info 2026-08-07, last price; previous close $2.24] |
| Market capitalisation | As reported: $161.8M (BPIQ). That figure is computed on the previous close of $2.24 — dividing it out gives 72,227,586 implied shares, which now matches the 72,227,580 shares the Q1 2026 10-Q reports to within six shares, so the stale share count flagged in the 2026-08-04 sweep has been corrected upstream. Recomputed on the last price: 72,227,580 × $2.28 = $164.7M. | [VERIFIED — Acumen Q1 2026 Form 10-Q, 72,227,580 shares as of 2026-05-07; BPIQ 2026-08-07; recomputed per rule 11] |
| Enterprise value | As reported: $58.8M (BPIQ). Stale by construction: it deducts the 2026-03-31 cash balance from today’s market capitalisation and ignores the term loan. Recomputed: ~$103M, being $164.7M of market capitalisation less ~$92M of modelled cash today plus ~$30M of term-loan debt. The reported number understates what a buyer would pay for the pipeline by roughly 40%. | [UNVERIFIED — modelled from the verified inputs above] |
| 52-week high / low | $3.60 / $1.19 — derived from the committed price cache (data/prices/ABOS.json, bars to 2026-08-05) with lib/prices.mjs range52w(bars, 2026-08-07), and identical to BPIQ’s own quoted range. | [VERIFIED — price cache, cross-checked against BPIQ fetch_company_info 2026-08-07] |
| Position in the 52-week range | 43.6% off the cache’s most recent close of $2.24 (2026-08-05), per the C.4 method: positionInRange(2.24, 1.19, 3.60) = 0.4357. On BPIQ’s live last price of $2.28 the same formula gives 45.2%. BPIQ’s own max_52_week_position field reads 0.43568 — the documented previous-close bug reproduces exactly, and this sweep it coincides with the cache-close figure because the cache’s last bar (2026-08-05, $2.24) and BPIQ’s previous close are the same print. | [VERIFIED — derived from the price cache with lib/prices.mjs] |
| Multiple off the 52-week low | 1.92× the low, and 36.7% below the high, on the $2.28 last price | [VERIFIED — recomputed] |
Two facts about this range matter more than the level. First, the whole 52-week range sits between
$1.19 and $3.60 on a stock that floated at $16.00 in July 2021, so the shares are down about 86%
from listing and the entire recent history is a penny-stock range [VERIFIED — price cache; the 2021 flotation price appears in the insider file as a $16.00 disposal line on 2021-07-06]. Second, the
intraday low of $1.19 printed in late January 2026 and the high within the following two months; on
closing prices the stock ran from $1.72 to $3.37 (+96%) between January and early April 2026 and
then gave half of it back, with no clinical data released in either direction [VERIFIED — data/prices/ABOS.json, closes between 2026-01-01 and 2026-04-15]. That run is the run-up baseline
for every program under this ticker, and it is recomputable from the committed cache for any date.
C.5 Ownership and flow
| Holder type | Share | Note | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insider | 6.80% | BPIQ insider_own reads 0.06801 with no unit label. Read as a fraction it is 6.80%, which is plausible for a 2021-vintage biotech whose largest holder sits on the board. | [UNVERIFIED — BPIQ 2026-08-07, units unconfirmed] |
| Institutional | 64.74% | BPIQ tute_own reads 0.64744 (0.64691 on 2026-08-04 — an immaterial drift). Internally credible: three disclosed funds alone hold 33.5% of the shares outstanding, and a 29.1% holder with a board seat is inside that figure. | [UNVERIFIED — BPIQ 2026-08-07, units unconfirmed but consistent with the 13F detail below] |
| Retail / other | residual | Not separately reported by any source in this sweep. | [UNVERIFIED] |
| Short interest | 7.62% | BPIQ short_float reads 0.07616, timestamped 2026-07-15, unchanged since the last sweep. No second source resolves the units for this ticker; read it comparatively rather than as a precise level. | [UNVERIFIED — BPIQ 2026-07-15, units unconfirmed] |
Insider flow. There has never been an open-market purchase by any Acumen officer or director.
That is a statement about the entire 233-row file, which runs from the 2021-07-06 flotation to
2026-06-17, with no new row since the 2026-08-04 sweep [VERIFIED — BPIQ fetch_company_insider_transactions 2026-08-07]. Every acquisition in that file at a non-zero price
is one of three things: an option exercised at its strike and paired with a matching option disposal
on the same date; a private placement; or the conversion of preferred stock at flotation. The one
line that looks like conviction buying, RA Capital’s 6,060,606 shares at $3.30 on 2026-03-16, is the
March private placement.
Selling is continuous and it is mechanical. In the first three weeks of January 2026 the chief
executive, chief financial officer, chief operating officer, chief medical officer, chief legal
officer and chief regulatory officer all sold, at prices between $1.71 and $1.99, in the days
immediately after the annual equity grant on 2026-01-16 — the classic sell-to-cover-tax pattern. In
June 2026 director Derrell Porter exercised options at a $1.07 strike and sold 32,300 shares at
$2.325 to $2.345, and director Nathan Fountain sold 6,400 shares at $2.2301 on 2026-06-09
[VERIFIED — same source]. None of this is a signal about the trial. What it establishes is the
absence of the opposite signal: with a company-transforming readout roughly a quarter out and the
stock at 1.9× its 52-week low, not one insider has bought a share in the market.
Concentration. Three funds held 24.20M shares at 2026Q2, about 33.5% of the shares outstanding:
RA Capital Management 20,992,669 shares valued at $49.542M, ADAR1 Capital Management 2,156,334 at
$5.088M, and Ikarian Capital 1,053,797 at $2.486M [VERIFIED — BPIQ fetch_company_hedge_fund_holdings 2026-08-07, unchanged since 2026-08-04]. All three implied prices are $2.36 per share, so the
quarter is internally consistent.
RA Capital is the fact that matters. It holds 29.1% of the company, it has a board seat, and it has bought in three separate rounds at descending prices: 9,770,773 shares before 2023, 5,161,290 at $7.75 on 2023-07-21, and 6,060,606 at $3.30 on 2026-03-16. Every one of those tranches is under water at $2.28, and the most recent is 31% under water after five months. ADAR1 and Ikarian both roughly doubled or quadrupled their positions in 2026 at the same placement price. The register is therefore concentrated, anchored well above the current price, and in no position to be a seller into weakness — but also unlikely to fund a fourth round on the same terms.
Deep Track Capital held 2,513,044 shares at 2023Q4 and was gone by 2024Q1; Perceptive Advisors and
BVF exited earlier [VERIFIED — same source]. The company was added to the Russell 2000, Russell
2500 and Russell 2000 Value indices on 2026-06-29, which brings passive holders but no view
[VERIFIED — press feed 2026-06-29]. George Golumbeski was appointed chairman on 2025-11-10, taking
the board to eight members [VERIFIED — press feed].
C.6 Options chain and its readability
Plain takeaway. The chain still cannot price this event, and it cannot even bracket it. There is no listed strike below $2.50 on a $2.28 stock, so nothing trades at the money. Total open interest across the entire December 2026 expiry is 153 contracts and total volume there on the day was 64 contracts, all in one $5.00 put. Any implied-move figure quoted from this chain would be a construction, not a price. The expected move for this readout has to be built from the scenario anchors in the program document instead, and that is what is done there. The one new fact is a modest accumulation of January 2027 calls — 320 contracts traded on the $5.00 call today against 186 of open interest — which is the first visible options positioning across the readout window.
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Spot | $2.28 | 2026-08-07 |
| Nearest listed strike to spot | $2.50 | The only three strikes in existence are $2.50, $5.00 and $7.50. There is nothing below $2.50 at any expiry, so the stock has no at-the-money option at all. |
| Expiry nearest the next catalyst | 2026-12-18 | ”Late 2026” runs to 2026-12-31, so this is the only listed expiry inside the guided window; the readout window’s latest edge (2027-01-31, program document) is spanned only by 2027-01-15. |
| At-the-money straddle ÷ spot | Not computable | The 2026-12-18 $2.50 call is bid 0.65 / ask 1.00 and the matching put is bid 0.00 / ask 2.55. A put with a zero bid gives no straddle. |
| Front implied volatility | 1.65386 on the 2026-12-18 $2.50 call; 1.25387 on the 2027-01-15 $2.50 call | No longer byte-identical across expiries as on 2026-08-04, but still not usable: the September and October $2.50 calls print 0.21 and 0.16 with zero open interest, and three puts sit exactly on the documented 0.01488 floor artifact. Treated as unpriced. |
| Open interest at that strike | 25 calls and 16 puts at the 2026-12-18 $2.50 strike | Total December open interest is 153 contracts. The largest single position anywhere in the chain is 818 calls at the 2026-08-21 $2.50 strike, which expires before the readout. January 2027: 164 contracts at the $2.50 call and 186 at the $5.00 call. |
| Liquidity confidence | LOW | Day volume across the whole chain was 64 contracts at the December expiry, 150 at one August put, and 340 across two January calls. Nothing here is priced. |
[VERIFIED — BPIQ fetch_company_options_data 2026-08-07]
C.7 Reaction to past catalysts
Seven distinct event dates from fetch_company_historical_catalysts, six of which carry price data.
The two 2026-07-15 rows are the same press release filed under two drug names and are shown once.
Unchanged since the 2026-08-04 sweep.
| Date | Event | Intraday move | Same-day press-feed check | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-15 | AAIC 2026: monkey data showing up to 40-fold higher brain exposure for the ACU401 brain-delivery candidate with no blood-count safety signals, plus interviews with 38 ALTITUDE-AD participants describing their symptoms before treatment | −12.60% intraday, on a +0.40% opening gap | Company release the same day, carried by The Manila Times and Stock Titan. Nothing else in the feed on 2026-07-15. The nearest other item is an Unlearn collaboration announcement on 2026-07-11. | The most informative row in the table. Nominally good preclinical news, cleanly attributable, and the stock fell an eighth. It says that this equity now discounts anything that is not the Phase 2 result, and that the market attaches no near-term value to the brain-delivery programme the March 2026 placement was raised to fund. |
| 2025-04-02 | Extended Phase 1 results presented at AD/PD, with an encore at the American Academy of Neurology meeting | +5.45%, on a +2.33% opening gap | Company release the same day; nothing else | Clean but small. Re-presentation of data already public. |
| 2025-03-26 | Enrolment completed in ALTITUDE-AD, ahead of schedule | +6.61%, on a +1.68% opening gap | Company release the same day; nothing else | Clean. An operational milestone, not data. |
| 2025-03-19 | Topline Phase 1 results for the under-the-skin sabirnetug formulation | +19.38%, on a +2.38% opening gap | Company release the same day; nothing else | Clean, and the largest positive move in the recorded history. Worth noting what it took: an actual human topline, albeit a formulation study in healthy volunteers, produced under 20%. |
| 2024-10-31 | Phase 2 screening data at CTAD showing the pTau217 blood test cuts unnecessary brain scans | +6.25%, on a +0.33% opening gap | Company release the same day; nothing else | Clean. A trial-conduct improvement. |
| 2024-07-29 | First subject dosed in the Phase 1 study of sabirnetug with ENHANZE | +10.83%, on a +3.45% opening gap | Company release the same day, one day after the AAIC Phase 1 biomarker presentation below | Confounded. The two consecutive days carry each other. |
| 2024-07-28 | AAIC: three doses of sabirnetug significantly reduced spinal-fluid markers of synapse loss | not recorded — BPIQ returned null for both price fields | Sourced to a Finviz quote page rather than a company release | A gap, not a zero. |
The read that matters. Six measured reactions span −12.60% to +19.38%, and not one of them is an efficacy readout. Every positive row is a conference presentation, an enrolment milestone or a dosing announcement; the only negative row is a preclinical presentation that the market disregarded. Nothing in this feed tells you how ABOS trades on the ALTITUDE-AD result, because the company has never reported a controlled efficacy result in its life. Any expected-move estimate for Late 2026 that leans on this table is leaning on the wrong precedent, and the single most useful thing the table does say is that the market’s tolerance for non-ALTITUDE news has turned negative.
C.8 Company data-quality flags
- BPIQ
max_52_week_positionreproduces the documented previous-close bug exactly. The field reads 0.43568, which is what the formula returns on the previous close of $2.24. Since v5.1.0 this row is derived from the price cache instead; this sweep the two coincide because the cache’s last bar is the same $2.24 print. - BPIQ market capitalisation is computed on the previous close ($161.8M = 72,227,586 implied shares × $2.24). The share count itself has been corrected since the 2026-08-04 sweep, when it was 657,000 shares stale against the 10-Q; it now matches the filing to within six shares. The previous-close bug family persists; the stale-count flag is resolved.
- BPIQ enterprise value is stale rather than wrong. The $58.8M figure deducts the 2026-03-31 cash balance from a 2026-08-07 market capitalisation and ignores the term loan. Recomputed: roughly $103M.
- BPIQ
short_floatunits are not resolved for this ticker. The field reads 0.07616 and no second source was found. Treated comparatively, not as a precise level. - BPIQ
insider_ownandtute_owncarry no unit label, read here as fractions (6.80% and 64.74%). The institutional figure is corroborated by the 13F detail; the insider figure is not corroborated by anything. - The 2023Q4 Boxer Capital 13F value reproduces the documented 1000× bug. It reads $9,158,000,000 on 2,206,983 shares, which is $4,149 per share. The share count is usable; the value is not.
- The insider-transaction feed is not limited to four filing quarters for this ticker, contrary to the tool’s own documentation. It returned 233 rows back to 2021-07-06, so the “no open-market buying ever” finding in C.5 rests on the full history rather than on one year.
- The historical-catalyst feed double-counts one press release. The 2026-07-15 AAIC announcement
appears as two rows, ids 8189 and 8195, under
ACU401andSabirnetug (ACU193), carrying identical price fields. Counting rows rather than dates would overstate the event history by one. - Options implied volatility is unusable in a new way. On 2026-08-04 the December and January $2.50 calls were byte-identical at 1.99532; today they differ (1.65386 / 1.25387) but the September and October $2.50 calls print 0.21 and 0.16 against zero open interest, and three puts still sit exactly on the documented 0.01488 floor. Neither set is usable.
- BPIQ
open_price_gap_percentandintra_day_price_change_percentdisagree in sign on the 2026-07-15 row (+0.40% against −12.60%). Per02-connectors.mdthe intraday figure is preferred and both are reported. - Cash burn exceeds the reported net loss and the reported operating expense, at $8.08M a month against $6.90M and $7.07M. The difference is term-loan interest and working capital. The cash figure is used because it is the one that determines when the money runs out.